A 19th century Dane named Hans Christian Andersen (a fine fellow despite his hateful middle name) published a story about an emperor who was conned into buying “new clothes.” He was told by the con men that the “new clothes” could be seen only by people who were not stupid. The reason the con men told the emperor that was because these “new clothes” he’d paid for were nonexistent.
Another outstanding essay. Frankly, I am disgusted by the left continually calling us mentally defective cult members because we can see Joe has no clothes. Speaking with someone who DOES see the clothes, leaves them treating you like the last genuine human in the "Invasion of the Body Snatchers," right down to finger pointing and screams
Son Hunter, of course, quite literally has no clothes, but that’s only on a doctored, erectionist laptop which isn’t real. Boy, these fairy tales are hard on my lying eyes. What is that the author of Hebrews says about “the evidence of things not seen”? Apparently, things that we do see are evidence of nothing. Alvin Bragg might be able to straighten me out on all this.
And I've never been called "Dr." for my J.D., and I've never asked to be. In fact, if someone did call me, "doctor," I'd furrow my brown and assume they're joking. :-)
Good article about President Incest except for the line "Hans Christian Andersen (a fine fellow despite his hateful middle name)." Why does that bother you?
Another outstanding essay. Frankly, I am disgusted by the left continually calling us mentally defective cult members because we can see Joe has no clothes. Speaking with someone who DOES see the clothes, leaves them treating you like the last genuine human in the "Invasion of the Body Snatchers," right down to finger pointing and screams
Hi, Glenn - It's "flout" the law, not "flaunt" the law. Tx.
Homer nods
Son Hunter, of course, quite literally has no clothes, but that’s only on a doctored, erectionist laptop which isn’t real. Boy, these fairy tales are hard on my lying eyes. What is that the author of Hebrews says about “the evidence of things not seen”? Apparently, things that we do see are evidence of nothing. Alvin Bragg might be able to straighten me out on all this.
Just wondering. Does Dr Jill have 4 sisters?
"He imperiously flaunts the law". Would that be flaunts or flouts?
yes.
It's "flouts" the law. It's a very common grammatical error.
Good one Glenn. Actually, outstanding one.
Like it or not, Jill is due the honorific, despite the weakness of her thesis and PhD.
Not to quibble, but it's not even a PhD. It's an EdD.
BTW, I've never been called "doctor" by virtue of my Juris Doctor, nor, to my knowledge has any other lawyer.
EdD … does that stand for Erectionists dysfunctional Disorder?!?
Heh … 😏
And I've never been called "Dr." for my J.D., and I've never asked to be. In fact, if someone did call me, "doctor," I'd furrow my brown and assume they're joking. :-)
Same as Alina Habba, J.D..
Good article about President Incest except for the line "Hans Christian Andersen (a fine fellow despite his hateful middle name)." Why does that bother you?
I was trying to be facetious. Maybe I missed the mark.
That's ok. Maybe I missed your intent. as well. Onward!
I get your point now. I kind of balked at that, too. Tx.